Science Is Not Always Correct There are quite a few things scientists have said which I cannot fathom how they could know. When a scientist recently said there was a universe here before the Big Bang it just made no sense to me how he could know this. I mean maybe there was but how could anyone say for sure there was? These are the kind of things which I find hard to swallow. There is something which is closely related to this and it is the fact scientists have said there are remains of black holes in space which were formed before this universe came into being. Einstein didn’t think the universe was endless, he felt if you started going straight out you would eventually wind up where you started, meaning the universe was curved. Some scientists are starting to think the universe might be infinite. This would mean there could be infinite locations where Big Bangs have taken place and perhaps, they repeat after many billions of years. Our brains can’t handle the fact the universe could be infinite because we are trained to think everything has a starting point and a finish line, a beginning and an end. We have no idea what is beyond the visible universe and as more powerful instruments are created, we just might find out facts which would astound us. Scientists claim the remains of an earlier universe are there to be seen, but when push comes to shove how can they prove they are 100 percent correct? Astronomers claim to have scanned over 10 million star systems and state there are no signs of life. They shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the chance life does exit is some of these places but it is too different from life on earth for us to detect. When we look for things like radio signals, we just might be barking up the wrong tree. It could be if there is alien life out there most of it has not advanced in that direction or is just to primitive. As far as looking for signs of industry they could be nonexistent, because they are either hidden from view, there is no industry or a race may have evolved beyond the point of using what we think of as machinery. Who knows, maybe there are not a lot of intelligent races in our universe, so few in fact there were none in the area the scientists were looking in. One of the areas I believe science is very weak in is dating some objects and structures. Take the pyramids for example. Most scientists think the Great Pyramid is 4580 years old. Yet there are inconsistencies which seem to make it older. It is obvious the three Giza pyramids are meant to be a duplicate or Orion’s belt, yet they would have lined up not 4580 years ago, but 10000 years ago. Scientists seem to disregard the fact the Sphinx could be much older than the pyramids and call the fact water marks appear on it a fringe subject. If the Sphinx was subject to a flood it would make it about 12000 years old and it is said if the erosion is considered on the structure this would be correct. I get a kick out of scientists when they talk about dimensions. I am not talking about the so called ordinary ones we all know about, but dimensions above the fourth dimension, if we consider that one as being time. It is just about impossible to prove other dimensions exist and yet we see as many as 11 dimensions being claimed and maybe more. We can’t even picture what one of them would look like. Imagine if someone came up to you and asked you to make a sketch of the 6th dimension for example. You would probably have no idea what to draw because you are limited by the dimensions you live in. So, knowing this, some scientists still attempt to draw these dimensions, why? The placebo effect has to do with drug trials. In a blind test some people are given the test drugs and others a pill which does nothing, yet some taking that pill say it makes them feel better or even cures them. We are told it is the power of suggestion, but do we really know? We can’t prove that, we just think it is obvious, but is that correct? While it might prove to be true, perhaps there is a subtle change caused by these pills which cannot be detected. Now for a way out theory. Could there be some people in the test who are very suspectable to suggestion and the people administering the test are actually hypnotizing them by the use of certain language without realizing it? We are told dark energy exists. Scientists had to come up with some reason why the universe is expanding at an ever increasing rate. We lack convincing proof it exists. One day this idea may disappear and something else take its place. It is almost as if something was invented to fill in the gaps in the theory of the universe which cannot be proved. Another thing some scientists say exists is cold fusion, but in all fairness the bulk of scientists say it doesn’t. It has been claimed cold fusion was achieved and yet no scientist has been able to duplicate the findings even when the experiment is performed the exact same way. This is very perplexing. One thing which I find interesting is when scientists try and date the human race. The date for our beginnings is constantly being moved back. How far back do we go? Some scientists are saying about 200000 years but others think it is more. There has been objects found which suggest we could have been around at the time of the dinosaurs. For example, there is a trail of rocks which has dinosaur foot prints with human ones right next to it as if the dinosaur and human walked together for about 100 feet. Paintings on ancient stones depict man and dinosaur together. A doll was found on a farm when the farmer was drilling for water which was over 150 feet down. Objects have been found in coal and inside rock which was very ancient and they were jewelry and small iron objects and even tiny golden springs. Most of this is dealt with by science by not talking about it since it goes directly against what we are taught. Science is not always correct in its conclusions no matter how certain at the time the scientist says he or she is.
|
