The Question About Landing on the Moon Has Come Up Again One rumor which has persisted for decades is the rumor we never landed on the moon. I thought this had finally been put to bed, but now it has come up again and an investigator is saying he has proof we didn’t land on the moon and that proof is a reflection in the visor of an astronaut which he says shows someone in the background not wearing a spacesuit and happily walking around. There is a small group of people who believe we have been lied to about the moon and I am not talking about faking the moon landing, I am talking about faking the fact the moon doesn’t have an atmosphere. I surprised you with this one, didn’t I? First, I want to talk about the reflection. You can look at it at this address which you can copy and paste into your browser. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5095949/Apollo-moon-landing-fake-photo-excites-conspiracy-fans.html Sorry Truth Facts doesn’t use active outside links. I can’t really tell what the reflection shows, but I haven’t devoted much time to trying to figure it out. There have also been stories about astronauts talking to aliens who don’t seem to need spacesuits. I bring this point up, because if you remember when we said we landed on the moon the astronauts sent a secret message back to NASA which was intercepted and they said they were being watched by several UFO parked on the edge of a crater. If we didn’t really land on the moon why would a message like this have been sent? The evidence for us sending astronauts to the moon seems to be overwhelming. Remember when Apollo 13 experienced an accident on the way to the moon? If one believes we didn’t go to the moon they would have to believe the Apollo 13 disaster was staged and never really happened. What about the moon soil samples which returned? Funny thing about them. The US government was found giving away moon soil to other countries and some of it turned out to be fake. It was the stuff which NASA used to practice moon walks on. Other samples are said to be genuine. It seems there wasn’t enough moon soil collected so someone in the government decided no one would know the difference and gave out some of the artificial stuff. There are some points which seem to show we may not have gone to the moon and these were latched on to immediately. The first one is the pictures which show the earth in the background of the sky from the moon. The size of the earth in the distance is only the same size as the moon looks from the earth, yet it should look about 4 times bigger because the earth is bigger. Does this mean we didn’t go to the moon? There are those who claim it does, but I believe that is not true and the reason for the discrepancy is the fact NASA didn’t want us to see the real photos of the moon because there were areas which might have shown things they didn’t want us to see. With all the scientists employed at NASA one would think the size of the earth in the sky would have been corrected before the photo was released. Why would NASA want to hide parts of the of the moon? There have been books written about what is really on the moon. One book titled “Dark Mission” by Hoagland and Bara states there are ruins on the moon. It talks about the remains of glass domes over craters, ruins of buildings and even an area when there seems to be all sorts of machine parts including the head of a robot just lying on the surface. If there were aliens on the moon and or alien structures these also would have been hidden, because the government thinks we can’t handle the fact we are not alone. You can hear an interview I did with Mike Bara about the book a few years ago by clicking on this link, archives/Interviews/MichaelBarra021308/MP3/Bara.mp3 I can understand why some people don’t think we went to the moon. This is brought on by the fact the government is so secretive. It makes it hard to believe a lot of things we are told by the government. It turns out some of the things that NASA did to coverup things they didn’t want us to see are an indication we really went to the moon. First of all, a very high definition camera for the time had been developed to take to the moon to broadcast pictures back to earth, but the pictures we saw were anything but clear and yet the pictures being sent to the NASA station in Australia were said to be crystal clear. The video seems to have been fuzzed up to hide what was in the background. There has been testimony to the fact about the clear video being received at the NASA station. If we didn’t really go to the moon we would have seen very clear video. Secondly the fact NASA now tells us all the video from this time was lost is another indication we went. NASA was probably afraid that advancing technology would allow people to clear up the video and see things on the moon NASA didn’t want us to. There is also some testimony by astronauts who talked about what was really on the moon. They were generally talking about UFOs. They claimed they were being watched and there have been many people who claim they have found proof in photographs which show alien bases on the dark side of the moon. The moon is a strange place and this was proved when NASA conducted crash tests and found the moon was hollow and the sound waves from the crash resonated for about an hour after the probe was crashed into the moon. This in itself could lead one to think there might be underground bases on the moon and maybe they might even be ours and we wouldn’t want that information to get out, thus retouched and airbrushed photos. To sum everything up, it is my personal opinion we did go to the moon and those who believe we didn’t are confusing coverups and secrecy for not going. I would like to end this article with a scenario which is believed by some. It is said we once were a powerful race and put bases not only on earth’s moon, but also throughout the solar system. A war broke out with an even more powerful race and they were the Reptilians. The story goes on to say not only did the Reptilians destroy our bases on the moon and throughout the solar system, the launched a nuclear attack on some of our cities on earth and we can still detect the radioactivity in them and see where some of the bodies were incinerated. |
