About Facts

Government Viewers Email Email Email

BackHomeNext


The One World Government Push

When I talk about the rich and powerful trying to establish a one world government a lot of people say this is baloney and prove it. There have been several instances of very rich and powerful people calling for one world government and the latest incidence of this which I know of was by Bill Gates. He said a world government is “badly needed” to save the earth. Sounds good on the surface doesn’t it? There are all kinds of world governments though are’t there. The Huffing ton Post translated one of his statements from the German newspaper the S'Oddeutsche Zeitung and here is what he said, “You can make fun of it, but in truth it was sad how the conference in Copenhagen is run, how individual who behave like the UN system failed.” As you can see the translation doesn’t seem to be perfect, but there is no doubt he is pushing for a one world government. We have been warned over the years that the rich and powerful had an agenda aimed at a one world government, because it would be easier for them to control. He also is part of the push to do away with cash, another of the favorite agendas of the elite. When all money becomes just numbers in a computer, it will be very easy to control everyone with the threat of wiping them out.

Why would anyone want a one world government or as they also call it a New World Order? The answer is not as complex as one might think. Democracy is a relatively new concept. If we look at the history of the world we see for most of human existence people have been ruled by the elite who controlled everything. The elite are trying to get this absolute power back. They are not happy just being super rich, they want to own us so they can not only live a god like life, but continue to increase their wealth by paying starvation wages or maybe even no wages in some cases. Some say the creation of the UN was merely one of the first steps toward world government. There is no way a fair one world government could be created even if the elites were not trying to create one to increase their wealth and power. Some say the plot began when the powerful bankers, who use their vast resources to control countries, thought it would be even better for them to have to only control one government, because they were facing some resistance in some countries like the US and even Russia. There is plenty of history showing some of these bankers and their ancestors have been backing both sides in many wars.

Many different world leaders and prominent people have pushed the idea of one world government. One unlikely source for such a statement was Former President Ahmadinejad. He said Iran and Syria will create a new world order. Henry Kissinger said some very scary things. He called for President Obama to create a New World Order. Infowars quoted Kissinger as saying “Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 riots in Los Angeles]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government.” I have no idea what Kissinger is responsible for or not responsible for, but some say he was behind many deaths because he used his influence to get presidents and others in power to carry out his plans.

If we want to look further at who is pushing for a one world government we see David Rockefeller thanking different news media for using discretion for over 40 years. In other words for not reporting what was going on in the push for one world government. Reese.com has the posted the following quote. It says it was from David Rockefeller’s 1991 Bilderberg Speech, "It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

Former French President Chirac in a speech said the UN’s Kyoto Protocol represented the first component of an authentic global governance and that for the first time humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance. Strobe Talbott was the Deputy Secretary of State under President Clinton and he said that nations as we know them were going to be obsolete and that all states will recognize a single global authority and they would realize sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all. I could go on and tell you about Gorbachev, Robert Kennedy, Gordon Brown and many others who had power, but I think you get the idea by now.

So the question is why do all these powerful people say the same thing? Is there some sort of script they are working off of? When many people say approximately the same thing it does make one think there is much more to it. Is there someone even higher up on the food chain telling these people what to say? It would be hard to believe they all had the same idea wouldn’t it? The second question is why would American leaders want to turn over our country to others? This would leave us subject to foreign laws and leave our people unprotected. Would they all push for this if there wasn’t something in it for them? I don’t think so do you? One World Order is a long range plan which has been pushed for decades and we have to carefully examine many of our agreements and laws to see if their reason for being is really only to push this agenda. What the world needs is not one world government, Β because it wouldn’t work, it needs better cooperation between countries and for some countries to stop trying to get the better of others.


BackHomeNext

Notice